In the wake of Prof. Fasina’s suspension from FUOYE, Lere Olayinka has made a bold comparison that reignites a national debate. “The woman who accused the suspended VC… provided recorded Voice Calls between her and the man,” he said, drawing attention to the critical role of evidence.
According to Olayinka, this distinguishes the FUOYE case from the ongoing saga involving Senator Natasha Akpoti’s accusation against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. “Which evidence has the other woman who accused the Senate President of sexual harassment provided?” he asked on X, pressing for consistency in the evaluation of public claims.
The contrast Olayinka makes raises important questions about the handling of sexual misconduct allegations in Nigeria—whether in academia or politics.While Fasina’s case triggered swift administrative action under pressure from the Education Minister, Akpoti’s claim has not seen similar legal or institutional response, perhaps due to the lack of verifiable proof.
By highlighting the “recorded Voice Calls,” Olayinka is advocating a shift toward evidence-based accountability rather than trial-by-media or political affiliation. His intervention may reshape how future allegations are received—demanding more than just accusations to drive consequences.His remarks could also influence how institutions draft harassment policies, balancing sensitivity toward victims with the need for due process.
